Article · SPE Journal · July 25, 2016
Wellbore Failure During Water-Alternating-Gas Injection by Use of Flow-Stress Coupling Method
Mahmood Bataee, Sonny Irawan, Syahrir Ridha, Hamed Hematpour, Zakaria Hamdi
Abstract
Summary Accurate evaluation of failure pressure is crucial in the design of injection wells. Besides, in-situ stresses play an important role in obtaining the results. Pressure and rock stresses are related together as the role of effective-stress theorem. In fact, pressure changes with stress alteration caused by change in porosity and permeability. Therefore, it should be obtained with the coupling method. Moreover, to calculate pressure, temperature, and stress in the fully coupling method, a huge matrix should be solved, and it takes long processing time to implement it. Therefore, this study developed a wellbore geomechanical model for stability during injection by use of the iterative coupling method. The processing speed was enhanced in this study because the parameters were calculated separately. The parameters of pressure, temperature, saturation, and stress were obtained for the multiphase-flow condition with numerical modeling. Furthermore, in this study, the finite-difference method (FDM) had been used to solve pressure, temperature, and saturation, whereas the finite-volume method (FVM) was applied to solve the wellbore stress. On top of that, the iterative coupling method was used to improve the accuracy of the stress results. As a result, a correction of approximately 20 psi (0.14 MPa) was noted for pressure in relation to stress, which is 1 psi (6.89 kPa). Moreover, the Drucker-Prager failure criterion was used to model the fracturing on the basis of the stress results. Other than that, sensitivity analysis on horizontal maximum (σH) and minimum (σh) stresses showed that by increasing σH, the maximum injection pressures to avoid fracturing had been reduced, whereas in the case for σh, an increment was observed.
More by Sonny Irawan
- An explainable physics-informed neural network prototype for synthetic proppant transport in a two-dimensional fracture domainPhysics of Fluids · 2026
- Physics‐Guided Neural Regression Modeling of Energy‐Balance Proxies for Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in 1D–3DInternational Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics · 2026
- Modeling and Prediction of Kappaphycus alvarezii Viscosity Using Artificial Neural Network and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference SystemJournal of Earth Energy Science Engineering and Technology · 2025 · Citations: 1
- Physics-Informed Machine Learning for Predicting Drilling Fluid Losses in Naturally Fractured Caspian FormationsSPE Annual Caspian Technical Conference and Exhibition · 2025 · Citations: 4
