Skip to content
DSML.KZ
Publications

Article · Engineering Technology & Applied Science Research · October 2, 2026

MPNet-Based Semantic Retrieval for Legal Evidence Selection: A Set Cover and Subset Selection Perspective

Айгерим Айтим, Anel Auyezova, Б.К. Синчев

Aigerim Aitim
Open via DOIPDF

Abstract

Legal decision support often depends on multiple conditions distributed across policy and regulatory documents. Retrieval-only systems can identify individually relevant passages, but may return redundant or collectively insufficient evidence. This study proposes a Legal NLP framework that combines MPNet-based semantic retrieval with controlled-cardinality evidence selection. Retrieved clauses are organized into compact subsets by jointly optimizing condition coverage, semantic relevance, redundancy, and subset size. The evidence-selection stage is formulated as a constrained set-cover and subset-selection problem. Experiments were conducted on LexIR-PolicyEvidence, a clause-level corpus comprising 850 policy and regulatory documents, approximately 14,000 clauses, and 1,800 query or case-description instances. The evaluation compared BM25, MPNet top-k retrieval, MPNet with greedy set cover, and the proposed method. MPNet improved Recall@5 from 0.68 to 0.79, MRR from 0.61 to 0.73, and nDCG@10 from 0.66 to 0.78. The proposed selection method achieved coverage of 0.86, sufficiency of 0.84, and redundancy of 0.24. The results demonstrate that retrieval quality alone does not ensure decision-ready legal support and that explicit evidence construction is required to produce compact and interpretable clause bundles.

Artificial Intelligence in LawInformation Retrieval and Search BehaviorTopic ModelingMPNetsemantic searchlegal decision support

More by Aigerim Aitim