Campus Decarbonization in Central Asia Through a Whole-System Sustainability Transition: A Case Study of the Tashkent Institute of Chemical Technology

Abstract

Higher education institutions are increasingly expected to reduce greenhouse gas emissions while maintaining reliable educational, laboratory, and administrative operations. This challenge is particularly relevant in transition economies, where university campuses often depend on fossil-fuel-based electricity systems, natural-gas heating, and aging infrastructure. This study presents a campus-scale decarbonization assessment for the Tashkent Institute of Chemical Technology in Uzbekistan. The quantified inventory covered Scope 1 emissions from natural-gas combustion and Scope 2 emissions from purchased electricity. Paper use, digital services, behavioural measures, and campus greening were assessed as supplementary institutional indicators and were excluded from the quantified total because consistent pre- and post-intervention activity data were unavailable. The assessment combined institutional utility records for 2023–2025 with information on renewable-energy deployment, heating modernization, digital transformation, sustainability awareness, and campus greening. A 300 kW solar photovoltaic system comprising 666 modules was commissioned in May 2023, with a documented annualized generation potential of approximately 520,000 kWh. Purchased grid electricity amounted to 711,402, 745,947, and 749,060 kWh in 2023, 2024, and 2025, respectively, while annual natural-gas consumption was 144,775, 161,200, and 142,031 m3. Using a conservative standard-based net calorific value of 31.8 MJ/m3 together with IPCC stationary-combustion factors, annual Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions were estimated at 637.53, 685.29, and 652.65 tCO2-eq, respectively. The 2025 total was 4.76% below the 2024 value but 2.37% above the 2023 value. The annualized PV technical potential corresponds to a theoretical maximum Scope 2 displacement of 276.64 tCO2-eq/year under 100% self-consumption. This value does not represent measured generation or a realized emission reduction and was not included in the quantified inventory. Digitalization, behavioural engagement, and greening were evaluated as complementary measures rather than assigned separate emission-reduction credits. The study provides a transparent and regionally relevant framework for universities in transition economies seeking to strengthen campus carbon management under incomplete data conditions.

More by Zafar Turakulov

• Reaction-Center-Guided Reranking of Transformer Product Predictions with a Product-Conditioned Graph Neural NetworkResearch Square · 2026
• A PROCESS-AWARE DATA PREPROCESSING AND TIME-DELAY IDENTIFICATION FRAMEWORK FOR CEMENT CLINKER ENERGY MONITORINGZenodo · 2026
• A Gradient Boosting Regression Model for Early-Stage Screening of Total Biogas Yield from Organic Substrates2026
• Techno-Economic Comparison of Carbon Capture Technologies with Exhaust Gas Recirculation in NGCC Power Plants2026